影片 【6/1 #立法會會議:朱凱廸抹黑林鄭?!】(Scroll down for English)

香港政府沒有錢承擔項目,而需要馬會撥35億嗎?西九整個項目預算有封頂,但並不等如香港政府沒有錢。香港政府打算建故官博物館應該按慣有程序經立法會批出撥款,在前期籌備階段,政府可以有你們自己的閉門會議。但若果方案涉及公帑使用,便應該按程序經立法會審批並且諮詢公眾,不能以政府缺錢為由,繞過立法會將項目外判,讓其他機構承擔項目開支。

現在最核心的問題是項目的錢從何來。不能夠單單以「馬會慷慨捐助」蒙混過去,這只是故事的一部份,我希望向全港市民講清楚故事的另一部份:究竟在過去一年特區政府就有關馬會作過甚麼決定?

#政府送了甚麼給馬會

1. 政府同意讓馬會增加5天本地賽馬日及8天海外賽事聯播日,每次本地賽事的投注額平均是12.8億,即光增加5天本地賽事政府已每年送多馬會60億元;

2. 2016年6月馬會與政府簽訂了50年的特殊用途土地契約;

3. 2016年7月,馬會行政總裁應家柏獲頒金紫荊星章。

我也不想將以上種種對馬會的厚待視作今次馬會慷慨捐助的交換,但這次馬會捐助建故宮涉及的金額巨大,而政府卻對和馬會交涉的過程一直保密,即是「摸底」啦。特區政府和馬會有這麼多次摸底、閉門會議,但我們對箇中過程、詳情卻一概不知。林鄭司長之前一直指是不想馬會尷尬而不願公開對話內宮,但現在方案已經公開,第一,林鄭司長有必要向公眾清楚交代你從去年年底開始和馬會所有的溝通紀錄。

第二,我們不希望這筆款項由馬會捐助,應該正正式式,有規有矩地由立法會批出撥款。

【Eddie Chu Bad-mouthing Carrie Lam?!】

Must the project be funded by The Hong Kong Jockey because the Hong Kong government could not afford it? There is indeed a ceiling to the budget of the West Kowloon project, but it doesn’t conclude to the Hong Kong government is in short of money. If the government intend to initiate the Palace Museum project, funding should be approved by the LegCo according to current procedures; during preliminary planning, the government can choose to retain information, when the project involves government funding, however, it should follow the procedures, be scrutinized by the LegCo and consult the public. Short in finance is not a legitimate reason for the government to bypass the LegCo and outsource the project, letting other organizations to fund the project.

The most fundamental question now is where is the money from. “Donated by the Hong Kong Jockey Club" is an ambiguous answered that will not be accepted; it is merely part of the story. I would like to point out to the public the rest of the story: what decisions did the government make concerning the Hong Kong Jockey Club in the past year?

【What Was the Deal?】

1. The government agreed to increasing racing days for 5 days, as well as 8 more days of overseas race broadcast. The average turnover for a racing day is 1.28 million dollars, by increasing the racing days for 5 more days, the government is allowing the Jockey Club to make an extra profit of at least 6 billion dollars
2. Signing a 50-year lease for special purposes with the Jockey Club
3. The CEO of the Hong Kong Jockey Club was awarded the Gold Bauhinia Star

It is not my intention to interpret the above as privileges offered to the Jockey Club by the government in exchange for the generous donations for the project. With the donation being enormous, the government retained all information concerning all communications and meeting with the Jockey Club. As citizens, we are uninformed of the countless meetings and negotiations between the two parties.

Mrs Carrie Lam explained holding back information as an act to prevent the Jockey Club from being in an awkward position. As the proposal is now disclosed to the public, it is necessary for Mrs Lam to account for all records of communication with the Jockey Club.

In addition, the project should not be funded by the Jockey Club through donations. All funding should be approved by the LegCo according to established procedures.
______________
Youtube 頻道:http://goo.gl/JtEXoR
網站:https://chuhoidick.hk/
Instagram:chuhoidick
Twitter:chuhoidick
Telegram 頻道:https://telegram.me/chu_hoi_dick

發表迴響

在下方填入你的資料或按右方圖示以社群網站登入:

WordPress.com Logo

您的留言將使用 WordPress.com 帳號。 登出 / 變更 )

Twitter picture

您的留言將使用 Twitter 帳號。 登出 / 變更 )

Facebook照片

您的留言將使用 Facebook 帳號。 登出 / 變更 )

Google+ photo

您的留言將使用 Google+ 帳號。 登出 / 變更 )

連結到 %s